Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIx downloading video crash #37122

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shahinyan11
Copy link
Contributor

@shahinyan11 shahinyan11 commented Feb 23, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #36833
PROPOSAL: #36833 (comment)

Tests

  1. Launch New Expensify app.
  2. Go to any chat.
  3. Upload a video.
  4. Tap 3-dot menu and make sure there is no Download action.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as in the Tests section.

QA Steps

Same as in the Tests section.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-02-28.at.13.28.39.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screenrecorder-2024-02-28-15-33-39-773.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-02-28.at.13.49.46.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-02-28.at.14.13.49.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-02-28.at.14.09.18.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-02-28.at.14.06.08.mov

@shahinyan11 shahinyan11 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 23, 2024 07:11
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 23, 2024 07:11
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 23, 2024

@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shahinyan11
Copy link
Contributor Author

shahinyan11 commented Feb 23, 2024

@francoisl We have another error which reproducible only for native platforms. The problem becomes from here.
On IOS the Url.getPathFromURL function gets file:///Users/... as param and returns Users/... which causes the download to fail here.
And on Android It does not work at all. It gets data/user/0/com.expensify.chat.dev/... and returns '' which causes the download to fail here.

Here we should use original status.uri for IOS and file://${status.uri} for Android instead sourceURI.

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

@francoisl, I don't have access to this doc, but according to the discussion here, besides adding a Ready To Build label you have to manually start the build

https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/15778/15779

This comment has been minimized.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

francoisl commented Feb 23, 2024

Yes I did, it just takes a while to build :) Anyway, it's built now except for iOSdesktop, I'll restart it manually.

Copy link
Contributor

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

At step 4 of the test, what gets downloaded for me is just a HTML page, is this due to the same issue you were referring to in this comment?

Screen.Recording.2024-02-23.at.3.03.11.PM.mov

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

I'm seeing "Attachment cannot be downloaded" error on iOS (simulator)

Screen.Recording.2024-02-24.at.00.32.27.mov

Weirdly, on a physical device even with current prod (without the fix from this PR), video preview is not displayed. Was this discussed and is this by design?

RPReplay_Final1708731177.MP4

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Also, could you please upload the missing videos for iOS/Android (native)?

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

video preview is not displayed. Was this discussed and is this by design?

Yes, at the moment on production, videos are still treated as regular file attachments. We just deployed the video player feature to staging.

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, at the moment on production, videos are still treated as regular file attachments. We just deployed the video player feature to staging

Ah, I see, thank you @francoisl!

The "Attachment cannot be downloaded" error is still present on a physical device

RPReplay_Final1708737731.MP4

@shahinyan11
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eVoloshchak @francoisl didn't you notice my comment ?

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, I see now!
Let's fix those two issues too, we definitely should get the whole download flow working

@shahinyan11
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, I see now! Let's fix those two issues too, we definitely should get the whole download flow working

@eVoloshchak It seems this PR will fix the problem with urls. We need hold current PR on that one

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

That PR you linked is merged. I tested again and pulled main into your branch locally, by default the proposed filename for download doesn't have an extension, do you see a way to fix that?

image

Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/37122/index.html ❌ FAILED ❌
Android The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/37122/NewExpensify.dmg https://37122.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@shahinyan11
Copy link
Contributor Author

That PR you linked is merged. I tested again and pulled main into your branch locally, by default the proposed filename for download doesn't have an extension, do you see a way to fix that?

image

Currently no. This needs to be explored further . But if it's a bug, it should be fixed in that PR because it was opened specifically to fix uploaded files.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak can you complete the checklist please?

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented Mar 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screenshot_20240304-182828

Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 18 34 53
iOS: Native

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-03-04 at 18 36 13

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-03-04 at 18 37 41

MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 18 35 35
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2024-03-04 at 18 35 07

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from francoisl March 4, 2024 17:39
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.47-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Mar 6, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.47-10 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines +145 to +147
useEffect(() => {
currentVideoPlayerRef.current = videoPlayerRef.current;
}, [url, currentVideoPlayerRef]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change caused another crash.
ref: #37710 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But here #37710 (comment) you yourself wrote that the crash came from combination of multiple video player PRs.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but I am commenting here since it's directly related.
I just suggested in the linked issue not affect payment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I got it. Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants